I didn't jump on this because quite frankly Pat Buchanan is a moron, and probably really bitter that despite his racist beliefs, he has not been able to really "make it" politically. Talk about failing.
I will make this quick. Watching this it is clear that what I have been saying for the longest time holds true. A lack of education and just plain stupidity is behind all forms of racism. When you're well-read and knowledgeable in information, and I mean truthful information, then you are incapable of formulating these "asshat" notions about the world and other cultures.
This is why I don't let these ignorant fools, black or white, make me or break me. I've read way too much, know too much for them to even make me do more than pity them.
When he says things like the United States was built by white men, all I can do is snicker. You have to be WILLFULLY ignorant to believe that, and to negate everyone's contributions to this country.
Pat, you can believe in your "truthiness" and your version of what you believe the world to be. That does not negate the truth. It is what it is, whether you like it or not.
Oh, Pat. *SMDH*
Oh, Pat! My Thoughts on The Miseducation of Pat Buchanan
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Seattle Slim
- I'm a writer of all trades. I write about every and anything that bothers or amazes my mind. You can catch my writing at Singersroom.com, Seaspot.com, Urbevents.com, HappyNappyHead.blogspot.com and MahoganyButterfly.com.
11 comments:
I think that Rachel get SUPER BIG PROPS because she was more gracious than Pat deserved!
And I don't know what Anon said, but if he was dissing Josie Baker, than I say double delete with a kick in the arse!!!
Well I use to think Pat had something worth while to say, now I'd agree with you, hes just an idiot
He is the most dangerous kind of village idiot, he gets near people of power, he sometimes sounds like he has a brain and he never GOES AWAY! But, I agree, tune out, he is just a good ol' white boy, with how many mistresses on the side? and not a human being as much as a moronic mouth spouting hate and ignorance. Rewrite history, but truth stands.
Pat speaks the truth!!
Pat is a race man; he just happens to be a race man for whites. His point is that the intellectual creation of this county (ideology, Declaration of Independance, Constitution, etc) were created by Europeans. Where is Pat wrong on that?
Anon 11:26AM,
Again Pat speaks HIS version of "truthiness." Seeing as how the universe does not revolve around him, you or I, whatever his truth might be, does not mean it is universally true or even correct. If you want you can refute with unbiased sources everything that man has said in that video. That's what you and your ilk fail to understand. Your world is based in an alternate reality and universe, not the one you actually live in.
Dream on.
Anon 9:24PM
We don't know if that's all the way true, considering that they wouldn't have given credit where it was due in the FIRST place. They thought of blacks as 3/5 of a human being if I am not mistaken. Even if I do concede you that point, is that even fair?
When I was in basic, you had a bunch of ass kissers who would always take up all the work on a Sunday. Even when others tried to help or wanted to help, they just had to clean the barracks all by themselves. Then they would bitch and moan that nobody helped them and they did all the work. When I hear Pat speak, he reminds me of those people. So again, if I concede your point, that's not a reflection on anyone else but the exclusionist practices of the founders.
Furthermore, they may have had the start up idea, but you and I both know that econimically speaking, and I can point to SEVERAL companies who owe their stature today to this, the hard labor done by Chinese, Mexicans, Blacks, etc. was a significant contribution. If you look just at England alone, you can see her rise thanks to the Caribbean. Spain? Caribbean and Latin America to name a few.
Again, his truthiness is bogus.
Dear Ms. Slim: My response to your response to anon: You argue that the white founders of the nation, who did indeed establish the intellectual foundations of the nation, perhaps can only take credit because they kept others from helping. One could argue that for any contribution by anyone in history, for example, Thomas Edison can only take credit for the lightbulb because he kept others from helping, who would have contributed but for his exclusionary practices, or the foundations of jazz music would have been in the Swedish immigrant community in Wisconsin, but blacks in the South and Chicago kept them from helping out. As to your second point: I don't think anyone, including Pat, would doubt the contributions of other groups, but there would have been no "USA" but for the intellectual foundations, there would have been no nation to which to contribute. The US, unlike any other nation, is just founded on ideas, and those ideas come from European intellectuals. Finally, kudos on responding substantively to comments, rather than just saying "idiot" or "racist" - it's a credit to you.
But Anon 6:14pm I see what you are trying to say but what you're saying is almost negating the fact that there had would have been blacks who would have been part of and privy to those intellectual ideas if they were permitted. That's the thing, we will never really know. If history were different, and the cultural climate at the time were equal, meaning no slavery, and equality for all (let's not forget that plenty of blacks fought in the Rev. War just to get freedom) and there were no blacks involved in the conversation on freedom, independence, etc, then Pat would be in essence more right, than he is wrong. Unfortunately, that's not the case. And from what I've read about South African historians hiding the significant contributions of African civilizations they unearthed, I would not be surprised if there was more info out there that may not ever see the light of day.
But again even if I concede that point to you, we have to remember that simply starting up a "business" is not enough to guarantee its success. The product, the output, the demand for that product and the labor put into making that product a success is what is important. The same thing can be said for our country. Just economically speaking, we are where we are because of the numerous resources we have available to us. Without the slave and immigrant labor, we may be saying "Long Live Good Queen Bess" still.
(let's not forget that plenty of blacks fought in the Rev. War just to get freedom)
Many blacks did fight in the Revolutionary War to get freedom; however, the vast majority of those fought for the British.
Anonymous, I think this discussion is missing the whole point of Pat's argument or its logical conclusion. Yes white men created the ideological documents upon which this country was founded (probably drawing upon numerous other sources in the process), but does that mean the other people who weren't part of that racial (and gender) group don't deserve the rights conferred to all American citizens by those ideologies? Or just because these white men wrote those ideological documents, all white men should have more entitlement to these rights because of it? Or even because they wrote it, they are the only ones that are allowed to administer justice on the supreme court and deliberate laws that govern the lives of all Americans. If your answer is "yes" to any of those questions your understanding of the declaration of Independence and the constitution are truly flawed.
Post a Comment